A Tale of Greed

Posted on: April 21st, 2017 by admin 4 Comments

print
Last month we reported that Swiss pharmaceutical manufacturer Roche, which owns the patent for the breast cancer drug Herceptin, had set the price at a level that was beyond what most women in South Africa could afford. Well, last week The Times of London published an exposé of how a South African manufacturer had increased the prices of scarce cancer drugs by up to 4,000 per cent. Aspen Pharmacare, which traces its roots back to 1850 in Port Elizabeth, purchased the marketing rights to the “Cosmos” portfolio of oncology drugs from British company GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) for £273 million in 2009.

As part of the deal GSK received a 16 per cent stake in Aspen that it subsequently sold for £1.7 billion, a healthy return for a portfolio of drugs that were long out of patent but lacked competition from other manufacturers. In England and Wales, Aspen exploited a loophole that enabled them to increase prices by dropping an existing brand name. The cost of busulfan, used by leukaemia patients, rose from £5 to £65 for a pack of tablets. In 2016 the British parliament tabled legislation that allowed it to impose lower prices for medicines if it felt prices were excessive.

The real story here though has been Aspen’s pricing in other European countries. It is alleged that as part of its aggressive negotiating strategy, the company deliberately created a shortage and then stopped supplying the drugs until its demands for higher prices were accepted. In 2014 the company ceased the supply of five cancer drugs to the Spanish health ministry. Aspen’s e-mail records show a senior executive recommended that if the ministry did not agree to the higher prices, “the only options will be to donate or destroy this stock.”

Last year the competition authority in Italy fined Aspen €5 million for raising the prices of its off-patent cancer drugs by up to 1,500 per cent. A pharmacist had complained that he was forced to choose between two families, each with a child suffering from cancer, because the deliberately small supply meant he had only one package of medication.

Aspen has been one of the darlings of the Johannesburg Stock Exchange for the past few years, with founder Stephen Saad becoming a dollar billionaire. The fall-out from this predatory pricing scandal has already had a negative impact on Aspen’s share price but, as Volkswagen and United Airways have recently discovered, the reputational damage is far more serious.

Share online:
  • Twitter
  • email
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Technorati
  • Print
  • PDF
  • RSS

4 Responses

  1. I always thought pharmaceutical companies cannot be that stupid!
    But it proves here and is outrageous. Not anymore to be explained by bad PR, but by SG (stupid greed).

  2. Marian says:

    Kit: I continue to be astounded by, and appreciative of, your vigilance in the world of health care matters, such as this one.

    Thank you for this information!

  3. Ed Blignaut says:

    Spot on, Kit, as you scout around for a price tag for CapeRay treatment. It is surprising that there has been so little legal red tape to limit the extent of price increases (worldwide?)
    Eddie Blignaut

  4. “Earth supplies enough to satisfy every man`s need,but not every man`s greed. ”
    M.Gandhi
    That says it all!
    Ian